By killing him we assure they're not going to come back after him or us, and then they can't torture the hell out of him or interrogate him or whatever.
So?
Whirl's got no argument about continuing to shoot at the guys who shoot at them but that's a fairly good solution.
no subject
Right? So what's the argument?
By killing him we assure they're not going to come back after him or us, and then they can't torture the hell out of him or interrogate him or whatever.
So?
Whirl's got no argument about continuing to shoot at the guys who shoot at them but that's a fairly good solution.