I may need to come back to edit this when I'm more awake tomorrow, and I definitely need to read everything over again, but here are some late points for L. A lot of this just depends on what other people post or say and whether or not he would feel a need to chime in, since much of it probably isn't unique.

- He will stick his nose into other teams' planning and discussion if it seems needed until a captain tells him to knock it off, at which point he'll probably gently argue with the captain.
- He is fine on Offense, but he would not feel that it plays to his strengths per se, and may attempt suggestions that are outside the box as far as what teams are supposed to be doing. (combining negotiation and offense, that kind of thing: he would think that if you need to do offense, negotiation has by definition failed, but you should be prepared for it to fail, etc etc.)
- He would have strongly supported Shepard for team leader, for reasons of his own.
- He is extremely technically savvy, but only in the context of his own universe and (to some extent) his previous game.
- He will probably attempt to get people to take planning off the network and do it face to face as much as possible. He's very alert to hacking and will point out, if no one else does, that anyone who's hacking can be hacked, that they should assume their transmissions are already being hacked, and so on. (This does not have to be successful and he may not be the only one saying it.)
- While he's sort of associated with stealth, he's more the kind of person who is the liaison or director for a stealth team than a person who does the stealthing.
- Nonlethal solutions are the best where possible, but he doesn't really have a problem with unavoidable killings committed in self-defense.
- All that said, I've struggled to come up with something meaningful for him to do in this, so I'm going to keep thinking about it!